.

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

No More Hiroshima and Slough Poem Comparision Essay

There heap be no doubt that Slough and No to a greater extent Hiroshimas sh ar a large collection of differences. However, they additionally have similarities. The poesy Slough written by John Betjeman and is expressing his hatred for the place. This be numerates apparent from the root when he ask for friendly bombs, come fall on slough. The satirical humour and juxtaposition of friendly and bomb are ironic and pose a dark image of the place, and this is continued throughout the poem with oral communication such as Death, and Hell.Moreover, the imagery of the poem is feral and ghastly which greats a disposition of negativity towards Slough. The poem No More Hiroshimas by James Kirkup shares a similarity with Slough due(p) to the aspect of war. No More Hiroshimas is constructed around the reconstruction of the metropolis Hiroshimas after having nuclear bombs released on it. Furthermore, both poets are infuriate by the cities.No More Hiroshimas begins with the tourist arrivin g at the station, At the station exit, my bundle in hand this already creates a sense of the poet coming off the train being confused at how meddlesome the station is and how he was expecting to see huge inspirational memorials, however he was astonished and disappointed to see no memorials and compares it to any ordinary Japanese town.The poet in Slough carees for slough to be obliterated as it says come bombs, and blow to smithereens whereas the No More Hiroshimas poem doesnt wish for the place to be wounded as the poet still sees Hiroshima as a precious place but it has just been used in the nonsensical way due to commercialization of the demolished city. Consequently I recall this portrays a sense of negativity and is extremely idiosyncratic from the poet Betjeman and this continues throughout the self-colored poem. In the poem No More Hiroshimas the poet doesnt stupefy any characters In a clear manner.Therefore he apprize talk about the place in a more cosmopolitan mann er. Conversely in Slough the poet introduces characters as he feels he has to recede his emotions out on the people not the city as it says for cause and get that man with double chin, wholl always cheat and always win, who washes his salacious skin In womens tears, the poet here is vehement that the people are additionally a cause for the failure of Slough whereas the in No More Hiroshimas there isnt blame on the people.

No comments:

Post a Comment