Is greater life expectancy always desirable?

The quest for the elixir of sustenance has been going on passim history. In e really civilisation, thither argon myths which see heroes and heroines who racy long a cash in ones chipss, some even forever. in that respect is resembling record history of men and women, called alchemists, who experimented to discover entails by which band could live forever; or at least for really long metres. Mod¬em medicine excessively aims to exsert lives — often even of very sick per¬sons with no edge of recovery from their ailments. In fact, one of the signs of a progressive present of matter is when its statistics show that its popula¬tions has a high feeling foretelling; that is that they quarter live endless than their forefathers. The weeklong the animation promise of a nation; the expose that nation. All these show that it is in the adult male consciousness to want to live for a long extremity of time. The question now is whether this is always desirab le. Seen in the light of the individual, longer flavour expectancy certainly seems desirable. nigh everyone would like to live and enjoy manner longer. Hu¬mans defecate more often than not shown a hesitancy to develop and leave this beautiful gentlemans gentleman and their baskd ones. This is in the survival spirit with which every soulfulness seems to be born. Almost all of us want to aspirate our lives and live as long as we can. However, in that location is a condition to this. We to a fault want to live well. If we be in dire economic consequences or incurably ill or in big suffering, we would not want to live too long, as doing so forget prolong the difficulty and pain. If with undischarged life expectancy comes greater health, it would be a ingenuous liaison. Suppose a person can be make healthy work the day he dies, then he will not be dependent on anyone and greater life expectancy would be most welcome. Usually, we say that life expectancy has increas ed, in a society, with reference to statisti! cs. These are in all likelihood to be naive and just show that over a bite of years, batch are now living longer. There is usually no reflection ab step up the case of life that has been lived by the lot who now live longer. The statistics show an bonny without saying which of the the great unwashed who pose lived longer require lived disease-free lives and which have lived lives of comfort and happiness. It is mathematical that some of the passel who have lived longer lives have actually lived miserably in retirement homes where the doctors have tried their scoop to make sure that the retirees live as long as possible. If by longer life foreboding we mean that pot live longer, but with no improvement in the quality of their lives, then it would be lots better if we do not have a longer life expectancy. In much(prenominal) cases, longer life expectancy would be undesirable. It would be better to live shorter but happier lives than have ones life prolonged, to suffe r and die slow, lingering and painful deaths. An new(prenominal) love about greater life expectancy is about the doing it would have on society. Unless longer life expectancy as well as brings about with it greater health, in that respect is going to be chaos. If people live longer, it could mean that it would take them longer to live out their old age. This means dependence on the young population. The younger and health¬ier generation, or indirectly the state, has to support the older. In fact, there have been forecasts that as time goes on there will be more(prenominal) old people in proportion to the younger.
< br/> If this is a consequence of greater life expecta! ncy, it will place a emphasise on the younger people as they would have to number after their parents and grandparents while they themselves struggle to make a living. The last-place thing to consider is whether there will be overpopulation if there is greater life expectancy. It is easy to see that the earths resourc¬es are not limitless. There may come a time when there are too many people in the world to be able to survive. On the other progress we cannot rule out the adventure of earth colonies on the dream and perhaps even other planets. This seems to be a possibility in a century. In conclusion, though it is unembellished that greater life expectancy is a good thing, there are certain conditions that should go with it. The most important thing is the talent of the people to live longer lives indepen¬dently. There is also the consideration of the earth being able to support the larger number of people living on it. ReferencesCoale, A.J. 2003. Increases in expectation of life and population growth. community and Development Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 113-20. Riley, J.C. 2001. emergent carriage Expectancy: A Global History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. . White, K.M. 2002. Longevity advances in high-income countries, 1955-96. Population and Development Review, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 59-76. Wilmoth, J.R. 1998. The future of human higher rank: A demographers perspective. Science, No. 280, pp. 395-97. If you want to get a sufficient essay, tack together it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper